vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Old Dominion (ODFL) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.6× Old Dominion). Old Dominion runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs 15.8%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs -5.6%).
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) is an American regional, inter-regional and national less than truckload shipping (LTL) company. In addition to its core LTL services, the company offers expedited, logistics and household moving services.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
ODFL vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $238.3M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 23.8% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 17.9% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.4% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.14 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $238.3M | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $229.5M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $270.9M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $268.6M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $254.7M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $263.1M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $308.6M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $322.0M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | 23.8% | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.6% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.3% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.1% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.6% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.1% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.5% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | $1.14 | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.10 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.28 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.27 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.19 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.43 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $288.1M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $40.0M | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.4B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $288.1M | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $120.1M | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.6M | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.1M | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.2M | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.7M | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.2M | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.6M | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | $40.0M | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.0M | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.0M | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.4B | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | $5.7B | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.01× | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $310.3M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $437.5M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $285.8M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $336.5M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $401.1M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $446.5M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $387.9M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $264.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $343.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $248.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $230.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $203.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $149.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.35× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.61× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.06× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.32× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.52× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.45× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.20× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
