vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OFG BANCORP (OFG) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($184.5M vs $184.3M, roughly 1.0× OFG BANCORP). OFG BANCORP runs the higher net margin — 30.3% vs 7.0%, a 23.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 0.9%). OFG BANCORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($199.3M vs $92.8M). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 2.8%).
OFG Bancorp, founded in 1964, is the financial holding company for Oriental Bank, located in San Juan, Puerto Rico. OFG offers a wide range of retail and commercial banking, lending and wealth management products, services and technology, primarily in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands through its principal subsidiaries: Oriental Bank, Oriental Financial Services LLC, and Oriental Insurance LLC. Its headquarters are located at Oriental Center, 254 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, San Juan, PR 00918....
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
OFG vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $184.3M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $55.9M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 25.7% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | 30.3% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.9% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 11.0% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.27 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $184.3M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.2M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.4M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.6M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $182.7M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.7M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $179.8M | $199.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $174.4M | $95.7M |
| Q4 25 | $55.9M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.8M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.8M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.6M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.3M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.1M | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.7M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | 25.7% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.1% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.4% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.9% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 30.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.8% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.5% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.27 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.16 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.00 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.10 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.00 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.08 | $1.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.05 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $12.5B | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $740.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $851.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $710.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $591.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $680.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $754.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $236.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $217.2M |
| Q4 25 | $12.5B | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7B | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5B | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5B | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3B | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2B | $577.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $217.7M | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $199.3M | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 108.1% | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.0% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.90× | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $345.4M | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $217.7M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.9M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $252.5M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.1M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.0M | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $199.3M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.5M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.8M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.7M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $231.2M | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.4M | $836.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.8M | $-22.4M |
| Q4 25 | 108.1% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.4% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.1% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 126.5% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.4% | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.90× | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.76× | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.82× | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.02× | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.24× | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.86× | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.23× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OFG
Segment breakdown not available.
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
