vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OFG BANCORP (OFG) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OFG BANCORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($184.3M vs $137.0M, roughly 1.3× STRATASYS LTD.). OFG BANCORP runs the higher net margin — 30.3% vs -40.6%, a 70.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OFG BANCORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.9% vs -2.2%). OFG BANCORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($199.3M vs $2.5M). Over the past eight quarters, OFG BANCORP's revenue compounded faster (2.8% CAGR vs -7.4%).
OFG Bancorp, founded in 1964, is the financial holding company for Oriental Bank, located in San Juan, Puerto Rico. OFG offers a wide range of retail and commercial banking, lending and wealth management products, services and technology, primarily in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands through its principal subsidiaries: Oriental Bank, Oriental Financial Services LLC, and Oriental Insurance LLC. Its headquarters are located at Oriental Center, 254 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, San Juan, PR 00918....
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
OFG vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $184.3M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | $55.9M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | 25.7% | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | 30.3% | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.9% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 11.0% | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.27 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $184.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.2M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.4M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.6M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $182.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.7M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $179.8M | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $174.4M | $144.1M |
| Q4 25 | $55.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.8M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.8M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.6M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.1M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.7M | $-26.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.0% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.1% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.4% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | -18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.9% | -17.0% |
| Q4 25 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.8% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.4% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.5% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.5% | -18.0% |
| Q4 25 | $1.27 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.16 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.00 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.10 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.00 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.08 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $12.5B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $740.3M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $851.8M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $710.6M | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $591.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $680.6M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.4M | $70.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $754.4M | $91.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $784.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $850.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $866.1M |
| Q4 25 | $12.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2B | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $217.7M | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $199.3M | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 108.1% | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.0% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.90× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $345.4M | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $217.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.9M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.1M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $252.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.1M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.1M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.0M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $199.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.5M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.8M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.7M | $789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $231.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.4M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.8M | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | 108.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.4% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 126.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.3% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.4% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 3.90× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.02× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.86× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.23× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
