vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OGE ENERGY CORP. (OGE) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snap-on is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $752.6M, roughly 1.6× OGE ENERGY CORP.). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs 6.7%, a 14.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Snap-on posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs 0.7%). Over the past eight quarters, OGE ENERGY CORP.'s revenue compounded faster (8.1% CAGR vs 2.0%).
Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company is a regulated electric utility company that serves over 843,000 customers in Oklahoma and Arkansas, including 1.5 million people in the Oklahoma City Metropolitan Area. It is the leading subsidiary of OGE Energy Corp., with headquarters in downtown Oklahoma City. OGE Energy is also the former parent of Enogex Inc., a natural gas pipeline business which merged with CenterPoint Energy's midstream business to form Enable Midstream in 2013, in 2021 OGE and CenterP...
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
OGE vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $752.6M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $50.2M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.0% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | 6.7% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.7% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.9% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $752.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $701.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $719.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $741.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $744.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $945.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.1M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $50.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $69.2M | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.3M | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.5M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.7M | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.9M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $218.7M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $102.3M | $271.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 59.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 62.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.2% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.0% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.5% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.3% | 29.9% |
| Q1 26 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.1% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 23.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.34 | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.14 | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.09 | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $5.07 |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $384.8M | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $397.8M | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $338.6M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.6M | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $347.1M | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $253.1M | $301.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.1M | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.3M | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-233.6M | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-167.0M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $103.0M | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-70.2M | $277.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.4% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.5% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.4% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.9% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.9% | 23.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.2% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.56× | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.15× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.25× | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.27× | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.59× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.47× | 1.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OGE
| Residential | $260.4M | 35% |
| Commercial | $212.0M | 28% |
| Public authorities and street light | $61.9M | 8% |
| Industrial | $60.7M | 8% |
| Oilfield | $58.4M | 8% |
| Integrated market | $47.3M | 6% |
| Transmission | $40.7M | 5% |
SNA
Segment breakdown not available.
