vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED) and PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PARK NATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($168.3M vs $142.2M, roughly 1.2× UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs 25.2%, a 0.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PARK NATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.2% vs -14.5%). Over the past eight quarters, PARK NATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs -5.3%).
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
OLED vs PRK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $142.2M | $168.3M |
| Net Profit | $35.9M | $42.6M |
| Gross Margin | 74.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 30.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 25.2% | 25.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -14.5% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.3% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.76 | $2.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $142.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $172.9M | $168.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.6M | $169.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.8M | $168.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $166.3M | $157.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.3M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.6M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $158.5M | $157.7M |
| Q1 26 | $35.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $66.3M | $42.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.0M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.3M | $48.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.4M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.0M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.9M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $39.4M |
| Q1 26 | 74.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 76.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 77.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 77.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.9% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.5% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.4% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.5% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.8% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.4% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.0% | 25.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.76 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.40 | $2.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.92 | $2.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.41 | $2.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.35 | $2.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.40 | $2.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $2.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $516.4M | $233.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $516.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $602.4M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $603.0M | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $571.3M | $237.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $492.7M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $551.6M | $201.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $530.5M | $261.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $9.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $108.9M | $198.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $191.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 114.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.03× | 4.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $328.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $108.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.1M | $198.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.2M | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.9M | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.6M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.7M | $178.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.9M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.0M | $50.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $191.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $84.3M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.5M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.5M | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $169.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.2M | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.9M | $49.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 114.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.4% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.8% | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | 23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 103.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.0% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.5% | 31.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | 3.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | 4.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.21× | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.77× | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.47× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | 4.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.19× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | 1.29× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OLED
| Material sales | $83.7M | 59% |
| Royalty and license fees | $54.2M | 38% |
| Contract research services | $4.3M | 3% |
PRK
Segment breakdown not available.
