vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED) and Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Perella Weinberg Partners is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($219.2M vs $142.2M, roughly 1.5× UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\). UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ runs the higher net margin — 25.2% vs 6.3%, a 18.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Perella Weinberg Partners posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.9% vs -14.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Perella Weinberg Partners's revenue compounded faster (46.5% CAGR vs -5.3%).
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
PJT Partners, Inc. is a global advisory-focused investment bank, founded in October 2015 as part of The Blackstone Group's spin-off of its financial and strategic advisory services businesses.
OLED vs PWP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $142.2M | $219.2M |
| Net Profit | $35.9M | $13.8M |
| Gross Margin | 74.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 30.1% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | 25.2% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -14.5% | -2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.76 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $142.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $172.9M | $219.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.6M | $164.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.8M | $155.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $166.3M | $211.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.3M | $225.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.6M | $278.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $158.5M | $272.0M |
| Q1 26 | $35.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $66.3M | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.4M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.9M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $-66.0M |
| Q1 26 | 74.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 76.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 77.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 77.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.5% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | -30.2% |
| Q1 26 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.8% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.0% | -24.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.76 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.40 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.92 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.41 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.35 | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.40 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $-1.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $516.4M | $255.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-127.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $797.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $516.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $602.4M | $255.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $603.0M | $185.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | $145.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $571.3M | $111.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $492.7M | $407.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $551.6M | $335.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $530.5M | $185.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $-127.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $-302.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $-318.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $-323.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $-421.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $-360.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $-283.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $797.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $650.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $606.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $570.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $876.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $810.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $645.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $108.9M | $34.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $30.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.03× | 2.52× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-34.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $108.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.1M | $34.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.2M | $59.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.9M | $56.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.6M | $-176.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.7M | $223.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.9M | $200.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.0M | $90.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $84.3M | $57.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.5M | $55.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.5M | $-177.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $207.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.2M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.9M | $83.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.4% | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.8% | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | -83.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 91.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.0% | 71.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.5% | 30.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | 3.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | 2.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.21× | 9.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.77× | 20.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.47× | -10.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.19× | 12.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OLED
| Material sales | $83.7M | 59% |
| Royalty and license fees | $54.2M | 38% |
| Contract research services | $4.3M | 3% |
PWP
Segment breakdown not available.
