vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. (OLPX) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($184.5M vs $105.1M, roughly 1.8× OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC.). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -12.5%, a 19.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 4.3%). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.8M vs $32.6M). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Olaplex Holdings, Inc. is a specialty beauty company developing and selling patented bond-repair hair care products. It runs three core segments: professional salon distribution, direct-to-consumer sales, and third-party retail, serving customers across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific with products that repair and protect damaged hair.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
OLPX vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $105.1M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $-13.1M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 68.0% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | -12.5% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.3% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.9% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $105.1M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.6M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.3M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.0M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.7M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.1M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.9M | $199.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.9M | $95.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.1M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.7M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $465.0K | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.8M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8M | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 68.0% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.1% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.2% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.5% | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.3% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 68.6% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.7% | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.1% | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | -4.3% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.1% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | -12.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.3% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.8% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.01 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $1.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $318.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $352.3M | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $879.4M | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $318.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $580.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $586.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $538.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $507.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $507.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $352.3M | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $352.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $351.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $649.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $650.5M | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $651.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $653.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $654.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $879.4M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $888.7M | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $874.2M | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $878.3M | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $874.4M | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $879.7M | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $863.3M | $236.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.7M | $217.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $577.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.40× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $32.7M | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $32.6M | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 31.0% | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $58.3M | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $32.7M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.0M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.7M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.5M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.7M | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.8M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.0M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.2M | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.3M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.1M | $836.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.3M | $-22.4M |
| Q4 25 | 31.0% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.6% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.1% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.9% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.0% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.7% | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.27× | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.26× | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.81× | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.64× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OLPX
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $43.6M | 42% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary Professional | $36.8M | 35% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary Specialty Retail | $24.7M | 23% |
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
