vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. (OLPX) and PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp (PRCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($105.1M vs $83.1M, roughly 1.3× PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp). OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -12.5% vs -38.1%, a 25.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs 4.3%). Over the past eight quarters, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp's revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Olaplex Holdings, Inc. is a specialty beauty company developing and selling patented bond-repair hair care products. It runs three core segments: professional salon distribution, direct-to-consumer sales, and third-party retail, serving customers across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific with products that repair and protect damaged hair.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is a medical tech firm developing and commercializing robotic surgical solutions for urological care. Its flagship AquaBeam system provides image-guided minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, serving providers and patients across North America, Europe and global markets.
OLPX vs PRCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $105.1M | $83.1M |
| Net Profit | $-13.1M | $-31.6M |
| Gross Margin | 68.0% | 64.9% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | -4.1% |
| Net Margin | -12.5% | -38.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.3% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.9% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $-0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.1M | $76.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.6M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.3M | $79.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.0M | $69.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.7M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.1M | $58.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.9M | $53.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-13.1M | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.7M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $465.0K | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.8M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8M | $-25.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 68.0% | 60.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.1% | 64.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.2% | 65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.5% | 63.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.3% | 64.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 68.6% | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.7% | 59.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.3% | -40.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | -27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.1% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | -39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | -28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | -38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | -50.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | -38.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -12.5% | -39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.3% | -24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | -35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | -35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | -48.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $318.7M | $245.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $352.3M | $51.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $879.4M | $347.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $487.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $245.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $318.7M | $286.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.4M | $294.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.3M | $302.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $580.9M | $316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $586.0M | $333.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $538.8M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $507.9M | $214.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $352.3M | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $352.1M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $351.9M | $51.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $649.1M | $51.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $650.5M | $51.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $651.8M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $653.1M | $51.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $347.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $879.4M | $365.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $888.7M | $380.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $874.2M | $385.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $878.3M | $389.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $874.4M | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $879.7M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $863.3M | $251.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $487.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $508.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $511.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $519.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $374.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $374.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.40× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.74× | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.74× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.76× | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $32.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $32.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 31.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $58.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.7M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.0M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.9M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.7M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.5M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $-15.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.8M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.0M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.2M | $-33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.3M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.1M | $-16.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.0% | -15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | -11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.6% | -22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.1% | -27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.9% | -49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.0% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | -31.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.27× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.26× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.81× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OLPX
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $43.6M | 42% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary Professional | $36.8M | 35% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary Specialty Retail | $24.7M | 23% |
PRCT
| Handpieces and other consumables | $43.0M | 52% |
| System sales and rentals | $23.4M | 28% |
| Other | $11.1M | 13% |
| Service | $5.6M | 7% |