vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Omnicom Group (OMC) and REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA INC (RGA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.6B vs $6.2B, roughly 1.1× Omnicom Group). REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs 6.7%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.6% vs -16.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Omnicom Group's revenue compounded faster (27.3% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Omnicom Group Inc. is an American global media, marketing, and corporate communications holding company, headquartered in New York City.
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated is a holding company for a global life and health reinsurance entity based in Greater St. Louis within the western suburb of Chesterfield, Missouri, United States. With approximately $3.9 trillion of life reinsurance in force and assets of $118.7 billion as of December 31, 2024, RGA has grown to become the only international company to focus primarily on life and health-related reinsurance.
OMC vs RGA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.2B | $6.6B |
| Net Profit | $418.7M | $463.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | 7.7% |
| Net Margin | 6.7% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.2% | 26.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 38.0% | 212.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.35 | $6.91 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $4.9B |
| Q1 26 | $418.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-941.1M | $463.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $341.3M | $253.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.6M | $180.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $287.7M | $286.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.0M | $148.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $385.9M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $328.1M | $203.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -17.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 5.5% |
| Q1 26 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -17.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | $1.35 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.78 | $6.91 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.75 | $3.81 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.31 | $2.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.45 | $4.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.27 | $2.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.95 | $2.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.65 | $3.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $4.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $13.5B |
| Total Assets | — | $156.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.3B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.0B | $13.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $13.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $12.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $11.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $10.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $9.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.4B | $156.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8B | $152.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.8B | $133.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.1B | $128.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.6B | $118.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.8B | $120.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3B | $109.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.77× | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.45× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.52× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $7.3B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 15.83× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $477.5M | $-990.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $210.1M | $-820.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-786.8M | $-1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $17.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $568.7M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-141.7M | $-967.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $438.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-816.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $537.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-180.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 54.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.83× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.40× | -3.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.82× | -4.56× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.73× | -5.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.30× | 115.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.47× | -6.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.43× | -4.76× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
