vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and Rackspace Technology, Inc. (RXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OneMain Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $682.8M, roughly 1.6× Rackspace Technology, Inc.). OneMain Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 18.7% vs -4.8%, a 23.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OneMain Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.3% vs -0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, OneMain Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.4% CAGR vs -0.6%).
OneMain Holdings, Inc.OMFEarnings & Financial Report
OneMain Holdings, Inc. is an American financial services holding company headquartered in Evansville, Indiana, with central offices throughout the United States. The company wholly owns OneMain Finance Corporation and its subsidiaries, through which it operates in the consumer finance and insurance industries as OneMain Financial. Its business primarily focuses on providing personal loans and optional insurance products to customers with limited access to traditional lenders, such as banks an...
Rackspace Technology, Inc. is an American cloud computing company based in San Antonio, Texas. It also has offices in Reston, Virginia, as well as in Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, India, Dubai, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Germany, Singapore, Mexico, Toronto and Hong Kong. Its data centers are located in Amsterdam (Netherlands), Virginia (USA), Chicago (USA), Dallas (USA), London (UK), Frankfurt (Germany), Hong Kong (China), Kansas City (USA), New York City (USA), San Jose (USA), Shangh...
OMF vs RXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $682.8M |
| Net Profit | $204.0M | $-32.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.6% |
| Operating Margin | 22.8% | -0.5% |
| Net Margin | 18.7% | -4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.3% | -0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.9% | 41.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.71 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $682.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $671.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $666.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $996.0M | $665.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $685.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.0M | $675.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $922.0M | $684.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $896.0M | $690.8M |
| Q4 25 | $204.0M | $-32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $199.0M | $-67.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.0M | $-54.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.0M | $-71.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.0M | $-56.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.0M | $-186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.0M | $25.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $155.0M | $-640.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.2% |
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.5% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.9% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.3% | -4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.8% | -94.5% |
| Q4 25 | 18.7% | -4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | -10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.3% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | -10.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.5% | -8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | -27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.3% | -92.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.71 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.67 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.40 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.78 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.05 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.31 | $-0.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.59 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | $-2.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $914.0M | $105.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.7B | $2.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.4B | $-1.2B |
| Total Assets | $27.4B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 6.67× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $914.0M | $105.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.0M | $99.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $769.0M | $103.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $627.0M | $128.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $458.0M | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $577.0M | $157.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $667.0M | $190.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $831.0M | $282.6M |
| Q4 25 | $22.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.5B | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $-1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $-1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $-1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $-1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $-949.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $-756.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $-787.2M |
| Q4 25 | $27.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.6B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.9B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | 6.67× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.61× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.55× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.72× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.59× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $865.0M | $59.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $56.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.24× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $90.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $865.0M | $59.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $828.0M | $70.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $774.0M | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $665.0M | $12.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $752.0M | $54.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $677.0M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $712.0M | $24.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $558.0M | $-90.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $56.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $42.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $34.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-118.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -17.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.24× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.16× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.97× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.31× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.03× | 0.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.60× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OMF
Segment breakdown not available.
RXT
| Public Cloud Services Segment | $442.2M | 65% |
| Private Cloud Service Segment | $240.6M | 35% |
