vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ON Semiconductor (ON) and Talen Energy Corp (TLN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ON Semiconductor is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $758.0M, roughly 2.0× Talen Energy Corp). ON Semiconductor runs the higher net margin — 12.0% vs -47.9%, a 59.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Talen Energy Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (114.7% vs 4.7%). Talen Energy Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($254.0M vs $217.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Talen Energy Corp's revenue compounded faster (35.0% CAGR vs -9.9%).
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. was an American semiconductor company based in San Jose, California. It was founded in 1957 as a division of Fairchild Camera and Instrument by the "traitorous eight" who defected from Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory. It became a pioneer in the manufacturing of transistors and of integrated circuits. Schlumberger bought the firm in 1979 and sold it to National Semiconductor in 1987; Fairchild was spun off as an independent company again in 1997. I...
PPL Corporation is an energy company headquartered in Allentown, Pennsylvania in the Lehigh Valley region of eastern Pennsylvania. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange as NYSE: PPL and is part of the S&P 500. As of 2022, the company had $7.9 billion in revenue, 6,500 employees, over $37 billion in assets, and serves 3.6 million customers.
ON vs TLN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $758.0M |
| Net Profit | $181.8M | $-363.0M |
| Gross Margin | 38.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 57.9% | -41.3% |
| Net Margin | 12.0% | -47.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.7% | 114.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -542.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.45 | $-7.60 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $758.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $697.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $409.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $654.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $353.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $459.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $346.0M |
| Q1 26 | $181.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $255.0M | $-363.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.3M | $207.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-486.1M | $72.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-135.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.9M | $82.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $401.7M | $168.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.2M | $454.0M |
| Q1 26 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 57.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | -41.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.7% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.3% | 34.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 7.8% |
| Q1 26 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.4% | -47.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.6% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 131.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.45 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $-7.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.41 | $4.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.15 | $1.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.88 | $2.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.93 | $3.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.78 | $7.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.4B | $689.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $6.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.3B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $12.0B | $10.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.41× | 6.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $689.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $497.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $295.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $328.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $648.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $632.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $2.6B |
| Q1 26 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | $12.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.0B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3B | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7B | $7.1B |
| Q1 26 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | 6.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.43× | 2.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.42× | 2.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | 2.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | 1.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $239.1M | $280.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $217.2M | $254.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.4% | 33.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.32× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.2B | $606.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $239.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $418.7M | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.3M | $489.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $602.3M | $-184.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $119.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.8M | $96.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.2M | $-23.0M |
| Q1 26 | $217.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $372.4M | $254.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.1M | $468.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $454.7M | $-217.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $101.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $434.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $293.6M | $83.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.7M | $-43.0M |
| Q1 26 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.0% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 67.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.5% | -53.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | -12.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 2.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2.56× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 0.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | -0.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ON
Segment breakdown not available.
TLN
| Electricity Sales And Ancillary Services | $555.0M | 73% |
| Operating Revenue Capacity | $182.0M | 24% |
| Physical Electricity Sales Bilateral Contracts Other | $21.0M | 3% |
