vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMERICA INC (CMA) and ON Semiconductor (ON). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ON Semiconductor is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $838.0M, roughly 1.9× COMERICA INC). COMERICA INC runs the higher net margin — 21.0% vs 16.4%, a 4.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COMERICA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.3% vs -10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, COMERICA INC's revenue compounded faster (108.9% CAGR vs -12.3%).
Comerica Incorporated is an American financial services company, headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is the parent of Comerica Bank, a regional commercial bank with 413 branches in the U.S. states of Texas, Michigan, California, Florida and Arizona. Comerica is among the largest U.S. financial holding companies, with offices in a number of U.S. cities.
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. was an American semiconductor company based in San Jose, California. It was founded in 1957 as a division of Fairchild Camera and Instrument by the "traitorous eight" who defected from Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory. It became a pioneer in the manufacturing of transistors and of integrated circuits. Schlumberger bought the firm in 1979 and sold it to National Semiconductor in 1987; Fairchild was spun off as an independent company again in 1997. I...
CMA vs ON — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $838.0M | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $176.0M | $255.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 21.0% | 16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.3% | -10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.3% | -32.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.35 | $0.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $838.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $849.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $829.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $825.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $824.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $784.0M | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | $255.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.0M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.0M | $-486.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.0M | $379.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.0M | $401.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.0M | $338.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.0M | $453.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -39.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | -33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | 22.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | 24.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.35 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $-1.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.25 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.22 | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $0.93 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.49 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $1.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.4B | $3.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $7.9B |
| Total Assets | $77.4B | $13.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | 0.43× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1B | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4B | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $8.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $8.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0B | $8.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.4B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.0B | $13.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.3B | $14.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.7B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6B | $13.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.4B | $13.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.84× | 0.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.02× | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.92× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.18× | 0.42× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-270.0M | $418.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $372.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 24.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.53× | 1.64× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $418.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-270.0M | $184.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $476.0M | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $601.0M | $579.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $465.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.0M | $362.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-205.0M | $498.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $372.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $106.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $454.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $434.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $293.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $207.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $276.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.53× | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.70× | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.54× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.49× | 1.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMA
Segment breakdown not available.
ON
| Industrial Segment | $426.3M | 27% |
| Other End Markets Segment | $337.3M | 22% |
| Intelligent Sensing Segments | $284.0M | 18% |
| Direct Customers | $282.4M | 18% |
| Intelligent Sensing Group | $230.0M | 15% |
