vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ONTO INNOVATION INC. (ONTO) and PRA GROUP INC (PRAA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PRA GROUP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($333.4M vs $218.2M, roughly 1.5× ONTO INNOVATION INC.). PRA GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 12.9%, a 4.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PRA GROUP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs -13.5%). ONTO INNOVATION INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($82.0M vs $-90.4M). Over the past eight quarters, PRA GROUP INC's revenue compounded faster (14.2% CAGR vs 2.6%).
Onto Innovation Inc. is an American semiconductor company formed in 2019 from the merger of Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and Nanometrics Incorporated. It is a provider of process and process control equipment and software for microelectronic manufacturing industries.
PRA Group, Inc. is a publicly traded debt buyer and debt collection company based in Norfolk, Virginia. The company buys delinquent consumer debt from credit card issuers and other financial institutions at a discount and pursues collection of the full debt owed. Founded in 1996, PRA Group employs more than 3200 people in 18 countries.
ONTO vs PRAA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $218.2M | $333.4M |
| Net Profit | $28.2M | $56.5M |
| Gross Margin | 50.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | 37.7% |
| Net Margin | 12.9% | 17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.5% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -46.8% | 206.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.57 | $1.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $333.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.2M | $311.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.6M | $287.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $266.6M | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $263.9M | $293.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.2M | $281.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $242.3M | $284.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $228.8M | $255.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $56.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.2M | $-407.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.9M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.1M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.8M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.1M | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.9M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.9M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | -101.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.7% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 31.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.7% | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.9% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.5% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.57 | $-10.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.69 | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.30 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.98 | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.07 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.07 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.94 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $603.1M | $104.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $979.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $603.1M | $107.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $217.5M | $131.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.7M | $128.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $212.9M | $105.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.7M | $141.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $172.6M | $118.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $190.9M | $108.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $979.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $928.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $4.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $83.4M | $-85.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $82.0M | $-90.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 37.6% | -27.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.95× | -1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $261.3M | $-169.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-85.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.4M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.9M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.0M | $-52.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.0M | $-94.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.2M | $-35.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.3M | $-29.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.1M | $-73.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.0M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.2M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.7M | $-53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | $-98.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.2M | $-36.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.0M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.2M | $-73.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.4% | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.4% | -19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | -33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.9% | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.71× | -0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | -14.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.15× | -5.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.27× | -1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.23× | -1.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.22× | -21.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ONTO
| Systems And Software Revenue | $173.8M | 80% |
| Parts Revenue | $23.9M | 11% |
| Service Revenue | $20.5M | 9% |
PRAA
| GB | $170.1M | 51% |
| Other | $163.3M | 49% |