vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ONTO INNOVATION INC. (ONTO) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($331.0M vs $218.2M, roughly 1.5× ONTO INNOVATION INC.). ONTO INNOVATION INC. runs the higher net margin — 12.9% vs 7.1%, a 5.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERFACE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -13.5%). Over the past eight quarters, ONTO INNOVATION INC.'s revenue compounded faster (2.6% CAGR vs -2.3%).
Onto Innovation Inc. is an American semiconductor company formed in 2019 from the merger of Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and Nanometrics Incorporated. It is a provider of process and process control equipment and software for microelectronic manufacturing industries.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
ONTO vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $218.2M | $331.0M |
| Net Profit | $28.2M | $23.6M |
| Gross Margin | 50.7% | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | 9.8% |
| Net Margin | 12.9% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.5% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -46.8% | 81.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.57 | $0.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.2M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.6M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $266.6M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $263.9M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.2M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $242.3M | $346.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.2M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.9M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.1M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.8M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.1M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.9M | $22.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.7% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.2% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.7% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.2% | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.1% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.9% | 35.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.9% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.57 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.69 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.30 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.98 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.07 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.07 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $603.1M | $61.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $196.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $634.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $603.1M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $217.5M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.7M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $212.9M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.7M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $172.6M | $94.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $634.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $451.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $83.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $82.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 37.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.95× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $261.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.4M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.9M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.0M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.0M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.2M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.3M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.0M | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.2M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.7M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.2M | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.0M | $12.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.71× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.15× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.27× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.23× | 0.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ONTO
| Systems And Software Revenue | $173.8M | 80% |
| Parts Revenue | $23.9M | 11% |
| Service Revenue | $20.5M | 9% |
TILE
| AMS | $195.7M | 59% |
| EAAA | $135.4M | 41% |
