vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Option Care Health, Inc. (OPCH) and PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. (PARR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.4× Option Care Health, Inc.). Option Care Health, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs 2.5%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.5% vs 1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Option Care Health, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs -4.9%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
Par Pacific Holdings is a Houston-based American oil and gas exploration and production company. Known as Par Petroleum Corporation after it emerged from bankruptcy, it was renamed Par Pacific Holdings on October 20, 2015. As of 2017 it was a Fortune 1000 corporation.
OPCH vs PARR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.8B |
| Net Profit | $45.3M | $46.2M |
| Gross Margin | 19.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 2.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.3% | 4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.0% | 279.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.29 | $1.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $45.3M | $46.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $58.5M | $77.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.8M | $262.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.5M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.7M | $-30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.1M | $-55.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.9M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.0M | $18.6M |
| Q1 26 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.9% | -2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | -1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 0.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.29 | $1.10 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.37 | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.32 | $5.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $1.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.28 | $-0.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.36 | $-0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.31 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.30 | $0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $177.3M | $172.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $177.3M | $172.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $232.6M | $164.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $309.8M | $159.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.8M | $169.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.4M | $133.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $412.6M | $191.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $483.0M | $183.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $376.9M | $179.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $802.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $967.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.86× | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.82× | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.82× | 1.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.79× | 0.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.78× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 0.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
