vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Opera Ltd (OPRA) and SILVERCORP METALS INC (SVM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SILVERCORP METALS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($223.8M vs $142.7M, roughly 1.6× Opera Ltd). Opera Ltd runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs -1.3%, a 14.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Opera is a multinational technology corporation headquartered in Oslo, Norway, with additional offices in Europe, China, and Africa. Opera offers a range of products and services that include PC and mobile web browsers, GameMaker and gaming portals, the Opera News content recommendation products, the Opera Ads platform, and a number of Web3 and e-commerce products and services. The company's total user base is 296 million monthly active users.
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (Silvercorp) is a Canadian-based, China-focused precious metals company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of silver-containing properties.
OPRA vs SVM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $142.7M | $223.8M |
| Net Profit | $18.3M | $-2.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 12.8% | -1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $223.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $72.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $172.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $114.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $211.6M | $60.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $174.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $115.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $28.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $3.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 30.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 22.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $107.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $107.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $81.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $28.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $79.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $54.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $45.7M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $31.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 27.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 19.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.19× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 4.25× | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 13.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
