vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Opera Ltd (OPRA) and Telesat Corp (TSAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Opera Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.7M vs $73.8M, roughly 1.9× Telesat Corp). Opera Ltd runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs -119.8%, a 132.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Opera is a multinational technology corporation headquartered in Oslo, Norway, with additional offices in Europe, China, and Africa. Opera offers a range of products and services that include PC and mobile web browsers, GameMaker and gaming portals, the Opera News content recommendation products, the Opera Ads platform, and a number of Web3 and e-commerce products and services. The company's total user base is 296 million monthly active users.
Telesat, formerly Telesat Canada, is a Canadian satellite communications company founded on May 2, 1969. The company is headquartered in Ottawa.
OPRA vs TSAT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $142.7M | $73.8M |
| Net Profit | $18.3M | $-88.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 95.3% |
| Operating Margin | 14.8% | 5.9% |
| Net Margin | 12.8% | -119.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $77.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $152.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $211.6M | $363.2M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $552.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $372.4M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $185.8M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $570.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-88.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.3M | $-52.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.1M | $547.4M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-172.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $56.3M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $60.6M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $42.1M |
| Q3 25 | — | 95.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 95.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -119.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 71.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | -34.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 150.7% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -31.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | 32.6% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 7.4% |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $352.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | — | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $352.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $399.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $552.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $1.4B |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $1.7B |
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $6.4B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
