vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Optimum Communications, Inc. (OPTU) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stanley Black & Decker is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.7× Optimum Communications, Inc.). Stanley Black & Decker runs the higher net margin — 1.4% vs -3.3%, a 4.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Stanley Black & Decker posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.1% vs -2.3%). Optimum Communications, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($199.4M vs $155.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Stanley Black & Decker's revenue compounded faster (0.3% CAGR vs -1.5%).
Optimum Communications, Inc. is an American telecommunications provider owned by Franco-Israeli businessman Patrick Drahi. The company primarily provides digital cable television and broadband services in the New York metropolitan area as well as in several Midwestern and Southern U.S. states. With approximately 4.9 million residential and business customers in 21 U.S. states as of 2017 it is the fourth-largest telecommunications company in the United States. Optimum is based at One Court Squ...
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
OPTU vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $-71.2M | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | 69.5% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.2% | — |
| Net Margin | -3.3% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.3% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -31.6% | -43.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | $-71.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6B | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-96.3M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-75.7M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.1M | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-43.0M | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-21.2M | $19.5M |
| Q4 25 | 69.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.7% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.1% | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.8% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 67.7% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 68.1% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 67.9% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.0% | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -55.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.5% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | -3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -77.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.9% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.47 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.21 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.11 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $268.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $26.2B | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-2.3B | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $30.7B | $21.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $938.8M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $247.3M | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $279.1M | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $256.5M | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $250.0M | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.1M | $318.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $284.4M | $476.6M |
| Q4 25 | $26.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.2B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.3B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.3B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.1B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.1B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.1B | $6.1B |
| Q4 25 | $-2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-624.1M | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-543.0M | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-469.2M | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-427.1M | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-399.1M | $8.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-431.2M | $8.9B |
| Q4 25 | $30.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.6B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.7B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.7B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.8B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.9B | $23.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.69× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $481.6M | $221.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $199.4M | $155.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.1% | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.9% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-118.8M | $369.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $481.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.4M | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.0M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $187.5M | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $439.9M | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $436.0M | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $306.8M | $573.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $399.7M | $-431.0M |
| Q4 25 | $199.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-178.1M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.4M | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-168.6M | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.9M | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.9M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-40.9M | $485.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.6M | $-496.7M |
| Q4 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.8% | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | -12.8% |
| Q4 25 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.9% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.97× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -22.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OPTU
| Total Residential Revenue | $1.6B | 74% |
| Business Servicesand Wholesale | $401.8M | 18% |
| Telephony | $60.8M | 3% |
| Other | $57.9M | 3% |
| Franchise | $50.0M | 2% |
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
