vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SYNTEC OPTICS HOLDINGS, INC. (OPTX) and High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SYNTEC OPTICS HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.5M vs $6.3M, roughly 1.2× High Roller Technologies, Inc.). High Roller Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 58.4% vs -4.6%, a 63.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SYNTEC OPTICS HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.5% vs -16.4%). SYNTEC OPTICS HOLDINGS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.4K vs $-90.0K).
S&S – Sansei Technologies is an American company known for its pneumatically powered amusement rides and roller coaster designing.
OPTX vs ROLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.5M | $6.3M |
| Net Profit | $-343.8K | $3.7M |
| Gross Margin | 23.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | -4.6% | 58.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.5% | -16.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 77.7% | 831.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-343.8K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-343.9K | $-592.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $323.7K | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-13.3K | $-501.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $281.8K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.2% | -7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | -47.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.6% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.2% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | -48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.2% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.5M | $6.6M |
| Total Assets | $24.3M | $16.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.28× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $-779.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $24.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.6M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.3M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.3M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.25× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.9K | $-78.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.4K | $-90.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | -1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $28.3K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.9K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $535.3K | $-78.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-158.0K | $-840.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.3K | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $623.8K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $417.3K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-289.8K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-4.4K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $496.3K | $-90.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-548.1K | $-845.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.6K | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-385.1K | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.4% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -53.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.01× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OPTX
Segment breakdown not available.
ROLR
| Net Gaming Revenue | $4.9M | 77% |
| Net Revenue Noncore Services | $1.4M | 23% |