vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL CORP (ORI) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.4B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.1× Roper Technologies). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 13.8%, a 2.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 6.7%). Over the past eight quarters, OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 10.5%).
Old Republic International Corporation is an American property insurance and title insurance company. The company is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
ORI vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.4B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $330.0M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 13.8% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.7% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.7% | 842.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $330.0M | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $206.5M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.5M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.4M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $245.0M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.3M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $338.9M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.8M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.8% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.2% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.1% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | 13.8% | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.82 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.11 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.81 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.42 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.32 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.35 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.9M | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $29.6M | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $5.9M | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | $29.6M | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.9B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.3B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.3B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.0B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.8B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.8B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.5B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $234.9M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $563.9M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.8M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $231.7M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.7M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.8M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $236.5M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.14× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.02× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.65× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.95× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.43× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.58× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ORI
| operating | $2.2B | 92% |
| Other | $201.8M | 8% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
