vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC (OSUR) and SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.6M vs $26.8M, roughly 1.7× ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC). SolarMax Technology, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.9% vs -72.1%, a 70.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SolarMax Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (623.5% vs -28.5%).
OraSure Technologies, Inc. is a Bethlehem, Pennsylvania–based company in the medical device industry. Their products include diagnostic testing kits. The company had recently developed OraQuick testing kit, the first over-the-counter home HIV test.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-efficiency solar PV modules and clean energy systems. It serves residential, commercial and industrial clients in North America and key Asia-Pacific markets, offering installation and after-sales support to boost low-carbon energy use.
OSUR vs SMXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.8M | $46.6M |
| Net Profit | $-19.3M | $-872.2K |
| Gross Margin | 41.0% | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | -75.1% | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | -72.1% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -28.5% | 623.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -78.7% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.8M | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.2M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.9M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.4M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.9M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-19.3M | $-872.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.7M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.7M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.8M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.5M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-615.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 41.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.1% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.1% | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.2% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.8% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -75.1% | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -59.4% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.7% | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -59.3% | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.2% | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.0% | -158.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -72.1% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.6% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -63.0% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -53.6% | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.8% | -60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.3% | -152.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.28 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.26 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $199.3M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $340.8M | $-12.2M |
| Total Assets | $403.2M | $91.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $199.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.5M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.6M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $247.6M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $267.8M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $278.6M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $267.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $263.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $340.8M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $380.7M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $396.3M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.3M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $425.6M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $425.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $403.2M | $91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $423.1M | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.0M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $457.6M | $38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $479.7M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $464.1M | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $466.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $467.6M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.0M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-9.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -37.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-53.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.1M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $220.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.7M | $-601.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $203.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-9.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-347.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | -37.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -40.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -38.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -67.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OSUR
| Product And Services | $24.9M | 93% |
| Other | $1.9M | 7% |
SMXT
| Yabucoa | $35.9M | 77% |
| Other | $10.7M | 23% |
