vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd (OSW) and QUALYS, INC. (QLYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($242.1M vs $175.3M, roughly 1.4× QUALYS, INC.). QUALYS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 30.3% vs 5.0%, a 25.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 10.1%). QUALYS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($74.9M vs $14.9M). Over the past eight quarters, QUALYS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (9.6% CAGR vs 7.1%).
Qualys, Inc. is an American technology firm based in Foster City, California, specializing in cloud security, compliance and related services.
OSW vs QLYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $242.1M | $175.3M |
| Net Profit | $12.1M | $53.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | 33.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 30.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 10.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -16.2% | 20.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.12 | $1.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $242.1M | $175.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $258.5M | $169.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $240.7M | $164.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $219.6M | $159.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.2M | $159.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $241.7M | $153.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $224.9M | $148.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $211.2M | $145.8M |
| Q4 25 | $12.1M | $53.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $50.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.9M | $47.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.3M | $47.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.4M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.6M | $46.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.8M | $43.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.2M | $39.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 83.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 83.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 82.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 81.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 81.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 82.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 81.3% |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 35.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 32.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 30.7% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.3% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 29.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.0% | 29.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 27.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.12 | $1.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.23 | $1.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.19 | $1.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | $1.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.13 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $1.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.15 | $1.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.21 | $1.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.3M | $250.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $84.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $542.6M | $561.2M |
| Total Assets | $707.1M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.15× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.3M | $250.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.6M | $225.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.0M | $194.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.6M | $290.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.4M | $232.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.8M | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.5M | $281.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.4M | $273.8M |
| Q4 25 | $84.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $98.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $542.6M | $561.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $552.8M | $529.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $548.3M | $508.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $530.6M | $498.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.5M | $477.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $540.1M | $449.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $532.7M | $427.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $515.5M | $404.2M |
| Q4 25 | $707.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $732.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $731.8M | $999.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $708.7M | $996.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.4M | $973.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $734.0M | $908.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $756.8M | $876.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $763.6M | $861.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.0M | $75.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.9M | $74.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.2% | 42.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | 1.42× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $68.4M | $304.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.0M | $75.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.2M | $90.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.3M | $33.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | $109.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6M | $47.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.6M | $61.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.7M | $49.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.0M | $85.5M |
| Q4 25 | $14.9M | $74.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.6M | $89.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.6M | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.4M | $107.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $41.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.5M | $57.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | $48.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.7M | $83.5M |
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | 42.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 52.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 67.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 32.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.5% | 57.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.36× | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.02× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | 2.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.15× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | 1.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.19× | 1.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | 2.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OSW
| Services | $197.3M | 82% |
| Products | $44.8M | 18% |
QLYS
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $88.6M | 51% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $86.7M | 49% |