vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Otis Worldwide (OTIS) and RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD (RNR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Otis Worldwide is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.6B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.6× RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD). RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD runs the higher net margin — 23.5% vs 9.5%, a 14.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Otis Worldwide posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.0% vs -36.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Otis Worldwide's revenue compounded faster (-0.5% CAGR vs -11.9%).
Otis Worldwide Corporation styled as OTIS is an American company that develops, manufactures and markets elevators, escalators, moving walkways, and related equipment.
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd is a Bermudian provider of reinsurance, insurance and other related business services. The company operates in reinsurance, insurance and ventures.
OTIS vs RNR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.6B | $2.2B |
| Net Profit | $340.0M | $515.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.5% | 23.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.0% | -36.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 39.9% | 72.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.87 | $6.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | $340.0M | $515.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $374.0M | $760.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.0M | $916.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.0M | $835.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.0M | $170.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $337.0M | $-189.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $540.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.0M | $503.9M |
| Q1 26 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.5% | 42.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 46.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.2% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.4% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 43.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | 25.0% |
| Q1 26 | 9.5% | 23.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.9% | 26.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 17.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.87 | $6.57 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.95 | $16.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.95 | $19.40 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.99 | $17.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.61 | $3.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.85 | $-3.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.34 | $22.62 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.02 | $9.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $834.0M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $10.5B | $53.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $834.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $840.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $688.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $942.0M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-5.4B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.4B | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.4B | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.1B | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.8B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.9B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.0B | $10.2B |
| Q1 26 | $10.5B | $53.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7B | $53.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.8B | $54.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $54.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.2B | $53.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.3B | $50.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3B | $52.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $51.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $380.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $817.0M | $483.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.0M | $157.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $690.0M | $778.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $380.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $772.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $337.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $156.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $651.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $284.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.18× | 0.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.00× | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.73× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.74× | 2.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OTIS
| Service | $2.4B | 68% |
| New Equipment | $1.1B | 32% |
RNR
Segment breakdown not available.
