vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Otis Worldwide (OTIS) and Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Otis Worldwide is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.6B vs $2.7B, roughly 1.3× Molson Coors Beverage Company). Otis Worldwide runs the higher net margin — 9.5% vs 5.5%, a 4.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Molson Coors Beverage Company posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.0% vs 1.0%). Otis Worldwide produced more free cash flow last quarter ($380.0M vs $-212.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Otis Worldwide's revenue compounded faster (-0.5% CAGR vs -15.8%).
Otis Worldwide Corporation styled as OTIS is an American company that develops, manufactures and markets elevators, escalators, moving walkways, and related equipment.
Molson Coors Beverage Company is a Canadian-American multinational drink and brewing company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois and Montreal, Quebec.
OTIS vs TAP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.6B | $2.7B |
| Net Profit | $340.0M | $150.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.5% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.0% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 39.9% | 25.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.87 | $0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $340.0M | $150.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $374.0M | $238.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.0M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.0M | $428.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.0M | $121.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $337.0M | $287.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $540.0M | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.0M | $427.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.6% |
| Q1 26 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.5% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | -98.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.2% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.4% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | 9.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | -84.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.87 | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.95 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.95 | $-14.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.99 | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.61 | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.85 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.34 | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.02 | $2.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $834.0M | $382.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.9B | $3.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $10.3B |
| Total Assets | $10.5B | $22.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $834.0M | $382.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $896.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $840.0M | $950.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $688.0M | $613.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $412.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $969.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $942.0M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.8B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.4B | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $7.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-5.4B | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.4B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.4B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.1B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.8B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.9B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.0B | $13.2B |
| Q1 26 | $10.5B | $22.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7B | $22.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.8B | $22.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $26.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.2B | $25.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.3B | $26.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3B | $26.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $27.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $380.0M | $-212.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | -7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7B | $1.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $817.0M | $540.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.0M | $616.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $718.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.0M | $-90.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $690.0M | $494.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.0M | $521.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $869.2M |
| Q1 26 | $380.0M | $-212.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $772.0M | $357.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $337.0M | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.0M | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $156.0M | $-328.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $651.0M | $383.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.0M | $350.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $284.0M | $691.7M |
| Q1 26 | 10.7% | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | -12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.18× | 2.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | -0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.73× | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.74× | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OTIS
| Service | $2.4B | 68% |
| New Equipment | $1.1B | 32% |
TAP
Segment breakdown not available.