vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Otis Worldwide (OTIS) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Otis Worldwide is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.6B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.4× Tapestry, Inc.). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 9.5%, a 12.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 1.0%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $380.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs -0.5%).
Otis Worldwide Corporation styled as OTIS is an American company that develops, manufactures and markets elevators, escalators, moving walkways, and related equipment.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
OTIS vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.6B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $340.0M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 9.5% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.0% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 750.0% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.87 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $340.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $374.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.0M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $243.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $337.0M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $540.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.0M | $159.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.9% |
| Q1 26 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.5% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.2% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.9% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.87 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.95 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.95 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.99 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.61 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.85 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.34 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.02 | $0.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $834.0M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.9B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $10.5B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $834.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $840.0M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $688.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.0M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $942.0M | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-5.4B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.4B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.4B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.0B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | $10.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.8B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.2B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $13.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $380.0M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7B | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $817.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.0M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.0M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $690.0M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.0M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $256.0M |
| Q1 26 | $380.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $772.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $337.0M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $156.0M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $651.0M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.0M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $284.0M | $209.8M |
| Q1 26 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.3% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.7% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.18× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.00× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.73× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.74× | 1.61× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OTIS
| Service | $2.2B | 61% |
| New Equipment | $1.1B | 32% |
| Other | $230.0M | 6% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
