vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ouster, Inc. (OUST) and Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ouster, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.2M vs $32.0M, roughly 1.9× Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.). On growth, Ouster, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (106.6% vs -0.0%). Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($15.0M vs $-37.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Ouster, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (54.8% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Ouster, Inc. is an American lidar technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It builds high-resolution, digital 3D lidar sensors for use in autonomous vehicles, industrial, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, and security systems.
OUST vs SAMG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.2M | $32.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $-120.0K |
| Gross Margin | 60.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | -2.8% |
| Net Margin | — | -0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 106.6% | -0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -107.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $62.2M | $32.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.0M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.6M | $31.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.1M | $32.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.1M | $30.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.0M | $31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.9M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-120.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.7M | $618.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.6M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.6M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-23.9M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-23.8M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | 60.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -61.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -76.5% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -73.0% | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -85.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -98.0% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -93.6% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -99.5% | 19.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -55.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -58.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -67.5% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -91.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -91.9% | 9.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.37 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.42 | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.54 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.53 | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.55 | $0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $208.6M | $44.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $261.7M | $50.3M |
| Total Assets | $349.5M | $166.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $208.6M | $44.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $244.5M | $36.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.5M | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.2M | $36.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $172.0M | $68.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.4M | $58.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.2M | $49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $187.8M | $39.7M |
| Q4 25 | $261.7M | $50.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.4M | $58.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $64.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $167.9M | $80.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $180.9M | $80.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $171.7M | $84.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.6M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.2M | $83.9M |
| Q4 25 | $349.5M | $166.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $353.8M | $157.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $321.8M | $152.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.6M | $159.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.1M | $194.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.2M | $184.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.9M | $177.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $317.7M | $170.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-15.4M | $18.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-37.2M | $15.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -59.8% | 46.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 35.0% | 11.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.8M | $17.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-15.4M | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.3M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.3M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.6M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.7M | $-24.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-37.2M | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.4M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | $19.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.3M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.0M | $15.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | $-24.7M |
| Q4 25 | -59.8% | 46.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.7% | 44.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.3% | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.6% | -80.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.3% | 62.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.4% | 42.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -81.5% | 50.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.4% | -81.6% |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OUST
Segment breakdown not available.
SAMG
| Investment Advisory Management And Administrative Service | $30.7M | 96% |
| Tax And Family Office Services | $1.2M | 4% |
