vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ouster, Inc. (OUST) and VICOR CORP (VICR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VICOR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($113.0M vs $62.2M, roughly 1.8× Ouster, Inc.). On growth, Ouster, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (106.6% vs 20.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Ouster, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (54.8% CAGR vs 14.7%).
Ouster, Inc. is an American lidar technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It builds high-resolution, digital 3D lidar sensors for use in autonomous vehicles, industrial, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, and security systems.
Vicor Corporation is a manufacturer of power modules headquartered in Andover, Massachusetts.
OUST vs VICR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.2M | $113.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $20.7M |
| Gross Margin | 60.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 59.7% |
| Net Margin | — | 18.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 106.6% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 713.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $113.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $62.2M | $107.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $110.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.0M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.6M | $94.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.1M | $96.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.1M | $93.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.0M | $85.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.7M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.6M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.6M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-23.9M | $-1.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.2% | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.1% | 57.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.2% | 95.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.8% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.3% | 49.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | 49.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 59.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -61.4% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -76.5% | 47.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -73.0% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -85.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -98.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -93.6% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -55.0% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -58.8% | 42.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -67.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -91.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.4% | -1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $1.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.37 | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.42 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.54 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.53 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $208.6M | $404.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $261.7M | $754.1M |
| Total Assets | $349.5M | $804.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $404.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $208.6M | $402.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $244.5M | $362.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.5M | $338.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.2M | $296.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $172.0M | $277.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.4M | $267.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.2M | $251.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $754.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $261.7M | $711.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.4M | $630.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $608.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $167.9M | $580.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $180.9M | $570.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $171.7M | $554.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.6M | $537.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $804.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $349.5M | $785.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $353.8M | $710.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $321.8M | $693.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.6M | $665.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.1M | $641.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.2M | $632.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.9M | $613.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-15.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-37.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -59.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 35.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-15.4M | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.3M | $38.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.3M | $65.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | $10.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.8M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.6M | $15.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-37.2M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $34.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $59.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.4M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.3M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.0M | $9.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -59.8% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.7% | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.3% | 61.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.6% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -81.5% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 7.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OUST
Segment breakdown not available.
VICR
| Product revenue | $98.0M | 87% |
| Royalty revenue | $15.0M | 13% |
