vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BLUE OWL CAPITAL INC. (OWL) and Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sensata Technologies Holding plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($934.8M vs $755.6M, roughly 1.2× BLUE OWL CAPITAL INC.). Sensata Technologies Holding plc runs the higher net margin — 9.3% vs 6.3%, a 3.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BLUE OWL CAPITAL INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.7% vs 2.6%). BLUE OWL CAPITAL INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($359.1M vs $104.6M). Over the past eight quarters, BLUE OWL CAPITAL INC.'s revenue compounded faster (21.3% CAGR vs -5.0%).
Blue Owl Capital Inc. is an American alternative investment asset management company that is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol: "OWL". Headquartered in New York City, it has additional offices around the world, including London, Dubai, and Hong Kong.
Sensata Technologies Holding plc is a global industrial technology company that designs, manufactures and sells a broad portfolio of sensing, electrical protection and control solutions. Its products serve automotive, industrial, aerospace, HVAC, telecommunications and heavy vehicle end markets, catering to manufacturing and enterprise clients across the world.
OWL vs ST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $755.6M | $934.8M |
| Net Profit | $47.7M | $87.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 22.2% | 15.1% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.7% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 129.8% | 24.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $934.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $755.6M | $917.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $728.0M | $932.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $703.1M | $943.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $683.5M | $911.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $631.4M | $907.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $600.9M | $982.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $549.8M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.7M | $63.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $-162.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4M | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4M | $69.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.7M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.9M | $71.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.2% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.6% | -13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.7% | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | 12.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | -17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $-1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $194.5M | $635.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $12.5B | $6.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $635.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $194.5M | $573.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.3M | $791.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.6M | $661.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.6M | $588.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.1M | $593.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.9M | $506.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $436.8M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.5B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.3B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.0B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.8B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $8.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.51× | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.22× | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.41× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $382.9M | $122.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $359.1M | $104.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 47.5% | 11.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 8.03× | 1.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.2B | $508.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $122.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $382.9M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $433.1M | $159.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $422.5M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.6M | $119.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $324.0M | $170.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $326.0M | $130.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.3M | $143.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $104.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $359.1M | $151.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $422.5M | $136.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.5M | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $86.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.1M | $138.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.8M | $91.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.4M | $98.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 47.5% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.7% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.1% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.0% | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 4.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.03× | 3.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.64× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.25× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.37× | 1.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.62× | 29.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.94× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.91× | 2.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OWL
| Credit Platform | $455.0M | 60% |
| GP Strategic Capital Platform | $157.0M | 21% |
| Administrative Service | $87.6M | 12% |
| IPI Partners LLC | $33.8M | 4% |
| Other | $22.2M | 3% |
ST
Segment breakdown not available.
