vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK) and PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp (PRCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.7M vs $83.1M, roughly 1.1× PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp). On growth, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp's revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs 13.7%).
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is a medical tech firm developing and commercializing robotic surgical solutions for urological care. Its flagship AquaBeam system provides image-guided minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, serving providers and patients across North America, Europe and global markets.
PACK vs PRCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $93.7M | $83.1M |
| Net Profit | — | $-31.6M |
| Gross Margin | 39.0% | 64.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | -4.1% |
| Net Margin | — | -38.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.3% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.7M | $76.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.8M | $79.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6M | $69.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $91.6M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.6M | $58.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.8M | $53.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.4M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.9M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.1M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $-25.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 39.0% | 60.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.1% | 64.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.1% | 65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.8% | 63.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.2% | 64.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.5% | 59.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | -40.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.8% | -27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.5% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.3% | -39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | -28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | -38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.1% | -50.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | -38.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.4% | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.6% | -24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.0% | -35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.3% | -35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | -48.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.0M | $245.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $401.9M | $51.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $534.9M | $347.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $487.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.75× | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $245.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.0M | $286.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.9M | $294.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.2M | $302.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.5M | $316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.1M | $333.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.5M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.1M | $214.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $401.9M | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.1M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $403.1M | $51.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $405.2M | $51.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.4M | $51.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.2M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.1M | $51.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $347.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $534.9M | $365.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.8M | $380.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $539.0M | $385.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $544.1M | $389.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $548.1M | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $564.3M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $566.2M | $251.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $487.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $508.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $511.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $519.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $374.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $374.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.75× | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.75× | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.74× | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.71× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.5M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.1M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.6M | $-15.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-19.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-16.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -31.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.56× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
PRCT
| Handpieces and other consumables | $43.0M | 52% |
| System sales and rentals | $23.4M | 28% |
| Other | $11.1M | 13% |
| Service | $5.6M | 7% |