vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK) and Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sprout Social, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.9M vs $93.7M, roughly 1.3× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, Sprout Social, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 11.8%).
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
Sprout Social, Inc. is a technology company that runs a social media management platform. A public company headquartered in Chicago, it was founded in 2010 by Justyn Howard, Aaron Rankin, Gil Lara, and Peter Soung.
PACK vs SPT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $93.7M | $120.9M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 39.0% | 77.6% |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | -9.0% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | 2.3% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $93.7M | $120.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.8M | $111.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6M | $109.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $91.6M | $107.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.6M | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.8M | $99.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $72.5M | $96.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.4M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.9M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.1M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $-16.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.1M | $-13.6M |
| Q4 25 | 39.0% | 77.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.1% | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.1% | 77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.8% | 77.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.2% | 78.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | 77.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.5% | 77.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.6% | 76.8% |
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | -9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.8% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.5% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.3% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | -12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | -16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.1% | -16.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.6% | -13.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.4% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.6% | -10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.0% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.3% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | -17.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.2% | -14.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.0M | $95.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $401.9M | $40.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $534.9M | $203.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $523.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.75× | 0.20× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.0M | $95.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.9M | $90.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.2M | $101.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.5M | $100.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.1M | $86.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.5M | $82.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.1M | $80.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.1M | $69.2M |
| Q4 25 | $401.9M | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $403.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $405.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.4M | $25.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $396.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $534.9M | $203.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.8M | $194.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $539.0M | $184.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $544.1M | $175.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $548.1M | $166.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $564.3M | $158.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $566.2M | $152.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.0M | $147.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $523.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $481.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $422.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $424.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $428.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $388.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $393.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $389.9M |
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.5M | $10.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $39.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.5M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.1M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.6M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
SPT
Segment breakdown not available.
