vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PACS Group, Inc. (PACS) and Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PACS Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.1× Schneider National, Inc.). PACS Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.4% vs 1.6%, a 2.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PACS Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.4% vs -1.2%). Over the past eight quarters, PACS Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs -2.8%).
Schneider National, Inc. is an American transportation company that provides truckload, intermodal, and logistics services. Schneider's services include regional, long-haul, expedited, dedicated, bulk, intermodal, brokerage, cross-dock logistics, pool point distribution, supply chain management, and port logistics.
PACS vs SNDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $59.7M | $20.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.0% | 2.7% |
| Net Margin | 4.4% | 1.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.4% | -1.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3022.5% | -21.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.42 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $981.4M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $59.7M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.4M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.0M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.5M | $26.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.9M | $35.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 3.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.42 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.32 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $197.0M | $227.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $353.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $946.8M | $3.0B |
| Total Assets | $5.6B | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.37× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $227.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $197.0M | $41.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.7M | $235.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $294.2M | $205.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $287.5M | $154.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $157.7M | $165.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5M | $231.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.4M | $157.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $353.2M | $390.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $509.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $512.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $565.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $411.9M | $420.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $124.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $125.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $946.8M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $871.3M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $806.8M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $750.2M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $709.6M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $572.1M | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.6B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.6B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $4.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.37× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.58× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.4M | $92.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $48.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.06× | 4.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $356.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $92.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $186.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $204.8M | $184.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.6M | $175.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.2M | $91.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.6M | $199.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.2M | $206.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.8M | $182.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $48.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $145.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $56.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $106.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-22.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $113.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $98.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $85.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.55× | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.06× | 8.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.91× | 9.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 4.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.28× | 3.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.78× | 6.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.39× | 6.75× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
