vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. (PAG) and Steel Dynamics (STLD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.0B vs $5.2B, roughly 1.5× Steel Dynamics). Steel Dynamics runs the higher net margin — 7.7% vs 3.0%, a 4.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Steel Dynamics posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.9% vs -1.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Steel Dynamics's revenue compounded faster (6.0% CAGR vs 1.7%).
Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) is an American transportation services company headquartered in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. It operates automotive and commercial truck dealers principally in the United States, Canada, and Western Europe, and distributes commercial vehicles, engines, power systems, and related parts and services principally in Australia and New Zealand. Additionally, PAG owns 28.9% of Penske Transportation Solutions, a business that manages a fleet of over 400,000 trucks, ...
Steel Dynamics, Inc. (SDI) is an American steel producer based in Fort Wayne, Indiana. With a production capacity of 13 million tons of steel, the company is the third largest producer of carbon steel products in the United States. It is among the most profitable American steel companies in terms of profit margins and operating margin per ton. Based on its 2021 revenue, the company ranked 196th on the 2022 edition of the Fortune 500.
PAG vs STLD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.0B | $5.2B |
| Net Profit | $234.9M | $400.1M |
| Gross Margin | 16.3% | 14.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 10.3% |
| Net Margin | 3.0% | 7.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.1% | 17.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.1% | 51.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.78 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $8.0B | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.8B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.7B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7B | $4.6B |
| Q1 26 | $234.9M | $400.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $228.1M | $266.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.0M | $403.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $250.0M | $298.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $244.3M | $217.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $236.4M | $207.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $226.1M | $317.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $241.2M | $428.0M |
| Q1 26 | 16.3% | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.9% | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.7% | 11.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.4% | 16.7% |
| Q1 26 | 3.6% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | 3.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 9.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.78 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.46 | $1.80 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.23 | $2.74 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.78 | $2.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.66 | $1.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.53 | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.39 | $2.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.61 | $2.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $83.7M | $556.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.2B | $4.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.7B | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $18.3B | $16.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.39× | 0.47× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $83.7M | $556.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $64.7M | $769.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.3M | $770.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.3M | $497.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.4M | $737.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.1M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | $5.7B | $9.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.6B | $9.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6B | $8.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $8.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $9.1B |
| Q1 26 | $18.3B | $16.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.6B | $16.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.1B | $16.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4B | $15.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.9B | $15.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.7B | $14.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.1B | $15.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.6B | $15.1B |
| Q1 26 | 0.39× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.39× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.28× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.32× | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.33× | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.36× | 0.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $148.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.37× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $148.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $123.2M | $272.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $379.5M | $722.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.7M | $301.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $282.7M | $152.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.7M | $346.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $271.0M | $759.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.1M | $382.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.1M | $84.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $300.4M | $556.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.9M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $206.1M | $-152.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.6M | $-106.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $190.1M | $138.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.9M | $-36.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | -0.8% |
| Q1 26 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.78× | 1.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.76× | 1.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.16× | 0.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.92× | 1.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.20× | 2.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.97× | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PAG
| New Vehicles | $3.1B | 39% |
| Used Vehicles | $2.4B | 31% |
| Other | $986.7M | 12% |
| Service and Parts | $863.9M | 11% |
| Fleet and Wholesale | $390.8M | 5% |
| Finance and Insurance, Net | $202.3M | 3% |
STLD
| Steel | $3.5B | 68% |
| Metals Recycling | $593.2M | 11% |
| Other | $490.1M | 9% |
| Steel Fabrication | $355.4M | 7% |
| Aluminum | $227.4M | 4% |
