vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LITHIA MOTORS INC (LAD) and PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. (PAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LITHIA MOTORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.2B vs $8.8B, roughly 1.0× PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.). PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 2.6% vs 1.5%, a 1.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.6% vs 0.3%). LITHIA MOTORS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.5M vs $25.1M). Over the past eight quarters, PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (9.0% CAGR vs 3.6%).
Lithia Motors, Inc. is an American nationwide automotive dealership group headquartered in Medford, Oregon. As of 2025, Lithia is the largest automotive retailer in the United States by revenue, ahead of competitors such as AutoNation and Penske Automotive Group. As of December 31, 2024, Lithia operates 459 dealership locations across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The company employs approximately 30,000 people worldwide.
Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) is an American transportation services company headquartered in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. It operates automotive and commercial truck dealers principally in the United States, Canada, and Western Europe, and distributes commercial vehicles, engines, power systems, and related parts and services principally in Australia and New Zealand. Additionally, PAG owns 28.9% of Penske Transportation Solutions, a business that manages a fleet of over 400,000 trucks, ...
LAD vs PAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.2B | $8.8B |
| Net Profit | $136.9M | $228.1M |
| Gross Margin | 14.9% | 15.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.5% | 2.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.3% | 14.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -36.6% | -3.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $5.90 | $3.46 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6B | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.2B | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2B | $7.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2B | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | $136.9M | $228.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $217.1M | $213.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $256.1M | $250.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $209.5M | $244.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $216.1M | $236.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.1M | $226.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $214.2M | $241.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $162.6M | $215.2M |
| Q4 25 | 14.9% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.4% | 16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.6% | 16.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.4% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | $5.90 | $3.46 | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.61 | $3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.87 | $3.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.94 | $3.66 | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.09 | $3.53 | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.80 | $3.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.87 | $3.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.89 | $3.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $64.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.7B | $2.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.6B | $5.6B |
| Total Assets | $25.1B | $17.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.47× | 0.39× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $206.5M | $80.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $202.8M | $155.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $234.4M | $118.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $72.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.8M | $91.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $516.4M | $115.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $264.4M | $116.9M |
| Q4 25 | $9.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $6.6B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4B | $4.8B |
| Q4 25 | $25.1B | $17.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.5B | $17.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.2B | $17.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.5B | $16.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1B | $16.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3B | $17.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2B | $16.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2B | $16.1B |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.23× | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $123.7M | $123.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.5M | $25.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.90× | 0.54× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.8M | $650.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $123.7M | $123.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-98.4M | $379.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $189.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $322.1M | $282.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.8M | $217.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $219.3M | $271.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-148.4M | $235.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $292.4M | $456.0M |
| Q4 25 | $30.5M | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-207.3M | $300.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-70.8M | $118.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.4M | $206.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.7M | $131.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.1M | $190.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-278.5M | $135.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $212.8M | $353.5M |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | 4.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.90× | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.45× | 1.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.04× | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.54× | 1.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.29× | 0.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.05× | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.69× | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.80× | 2.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LAD
Segment breakdown not available.
PAG
| New Vehicle | $3.9B | 44% |
| Used Vehicle | $2.3B | 26% |
| Service And Parts | $953.6M | 11% |
| Retail Commercial Truck Dealership Segment | $725.4M | 8% |
| Other | $414.5M | 5% |
| Commercial Vehicle Distribution And Other | $303.3M | 3% |
| Finance And Insurance Net | $221.9M | 3% |
