vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc (PAL) and TRICO BANCSHARES (TCBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRICO BANCSHARES is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($109.4M vs $91.5M, roughly 1.2× Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc). TRICO BANCSHARES runs the higher net margin — 251.6% vs -1.5%, a 253.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. is a specialized automotive sector logistics provider. It offers tailored solutions including finished vehicle transport, auto parts storage and distribution, and supply chain support for automotive industry stakeholders, prioritizing reliable, efficient service delivery.
Trico Bancshares is a U.S.-headquartered regional bank holding company operating Tri Counties Bank. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services including deposit products, mortgages, small business loans, and wealth management, primarily serving consumers and SMEs in Northern California.
PAL vs TCBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $91.5M | $109.4M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $33.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -2.4% | 42.6% |
| Net Margin | -1.5% | 251.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 15.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $109.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $107.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $103.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.5M | $99.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $98.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.4% | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 251.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 221.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.5% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.83 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.8M | $157.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $64.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $338.5M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $498.2M | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.19× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $298.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $314.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $308.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $145.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.8M | $320.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $206.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $82.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $338.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $498.2M | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $133.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $127.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 116.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $222.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $133.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $109.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $127.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $43.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $24.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 104.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
