vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. (PANL) and USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
USA Compression Partners, LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.5M vs $183.9M, roughly 1.4× Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.). USA Compression Partners, LP runs the higher net margin — 11.0% vs 6.5%, a 4.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.9% vs 2.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (32.5% CAGR vs 4.9%).
Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. is a global dry bulk logistics and shipping service provider. It operates a modern fleet of dry bulk vessels to transport a wide range of commodities including grains, minerals, construction materials, and energy-related raw materials, serving industrial, agricultural, and energy sector clients across North America, Europe, and Asia with tailored end-to-end bulk cargo supply chain solutions.
USA Compression Partners, LP is a US-based provider of natural gas compression services and related infrastructure solutions. It serves clients across the upstream, midstream, and downstream segments of the oil and gas industry, offering custom compression systems, maintenance, and operational support to facilitate efficient natural gas production, processing, and transportation.
PANL vs USAC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $183.9M | $252.5M |
| Net Profit | $11.9M | $27.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 30.3% |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | 11.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 24.9% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 40.9% | 9.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $183.9M | $252.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.7M | $250.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $156.7M | $250.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $122.8M | $245.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.2M | $245.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.1M | $240.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.5M | $235.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.7M | $229.3M |
| Q4 25 | $11.9M | $27.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $34.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | $28.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.0M | $20.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.4M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1M | $19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 28.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.1% | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 32.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | 29.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.25 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.1M | $8.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $249.6M | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $429.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $928.1M | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.58× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.1M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.3M | $2.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.9M | $2.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.8M | $14.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.1M | $79.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.9M | $9.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.9M | $8.0K |
| Q4 25 | $249.6M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $256.2M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $244.7M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $251.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.2M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.5M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.9M | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $429.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $414.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $420.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $427.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $332.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $331.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $332.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $928.1M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $932.1M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $916.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $918.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $936.5M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $749.2M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $692.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $703.3M | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.29× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.1M | $139.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $87.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 34.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 20.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.27× | 5.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $277.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.6M | $75.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $124.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4M | $54.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $130.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.5M | $48.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0M | $96.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0M | $65.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $87.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $101.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $101.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $48.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-32.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 43.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.27× | 5.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | 2.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 5.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.57× | 2.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.43× | 3.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.77× | 2.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PANL
| Voyage | $166.3M | 90% |
| Charter | $13.1M | 7% |
| Terminal Stevedore Revenue | $4.4M | 2% |
USAC
| Revenue From Contract Operations Excluding Revenue From Related Party | $231.7M | 92% |
| Entities Affiliated With Energy Transfer LP | $16.6M | 7% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $5.4M | 2% |
