vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC (PB) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLYMPIC STEEL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($490.7M vs $367.6M, roughly 1.3× PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC). PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 31.6% vs 0.4%, a 31.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (19.2% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Houston, Texas with operations in Texas and central Oklahoma. As of December 31, 2019, the company operated 285 branches: 65 in the Houston area, including The Woodlands, Texas; 30 in South Texas, including Corpus Christi, Texas and Victoria, Texas; 75 in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex; 22 in East Texas; 29 in Central Texas, including Austin, Texas and San Antonio; 34 in West Texas, including Lubbock, Texas, Midland–Odess...
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
PB vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $367.6M | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $116.3M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 31.6% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -10.7% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.16 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $367.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $275.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $273.4M | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.4M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $267.8M | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $261.7M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $258.8M | $526.3M |
| Q1 26 | $116.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $139.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.6M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.2M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.1M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.6M | $7.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 65.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.2% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | 31.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.1% | 1.5% |
| Q1 26 | $1.16 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.48 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.45 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.37 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.36 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.34 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.17 | $0.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.2B | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $43.6B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.2M |
| Q1 26 | $8.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6B | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5B | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $569.5M |
| Q1 26 | $43.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.37× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $78.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $194.8M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.2M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.2M | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-205.8M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $274.6M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.5M | $-2.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $185.7M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.8M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.1M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-210.7M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $270.2M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $211.8M | $-11.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.9% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 64.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -78.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 103.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.8% | -2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.42× | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.37× | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.58× | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.16× | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.94× | -0.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PB
| Net Interest Income | $321.1M | 87% |
| Noninterest Income | $46.5M | 13% |
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |