vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI) and Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sprout Social, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.9M vs $75.5M, roughly 1.6× PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.). On growth, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.7% vs 12.9%). PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $9.9M). Over the past eight quarters, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (31.3% CAGR vs 11.8%).
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
Sprout Social, Inc. is a technology company that runs a social media management platform. A public company headquartered in Chicago, it was founded in 2010 by Justyn Howard, Aaron Rankin, Gil Lara, and Peter Soung.
PBYI vs SPT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.5M | $120.9M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 69.3% | 77.6% |
| Operating Margin | 22.7% | -9.0% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | 27.7% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.26 | $-0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $75.5M | $120.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.5M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.4M | $111.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.0M | $109.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.1M | $107.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.5M | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.1M | $99.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.8M | $96.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.5M | $-16.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.8M | $-13.6M |
| Q4 25 | 69.3% | 77.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.7% | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.5% | 77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.1% | 77.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 76.4% | 78.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.9% | 77.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.4% | 77.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 75.5% | 76.8% |
| Q4 25 | 22.7% | -9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.6% | -12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | -16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.6% | -16.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | -13.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | -10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.6% | -17.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | -14.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.26 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.17 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.40 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.41 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $97.5M | $95.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.7M | $40.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $130.3M | $203.4M |
| Total Assets | $216.3M | $523.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | 0.20× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $97.5M | $95.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.4M | $90.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.0M | $101.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.2M | $100.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.0M | $86.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.7M | $82.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.8M | $80.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.2M | $69.2M |
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | $25.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $102.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $130.3M | $203.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.3M | $194.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.7M | $184.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $175.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.1M | $166.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.1M | $158.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.5M | $152.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.0M | $147.3M |
| Q4 25 | $216.3M | $523.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $202.9M | $481.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.9M | $422.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $196.2M | $424.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.3M | $428.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $220.7M | $388.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.0M | $393.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $214.1M | $389.9M |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.4M | $10.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.4M | $9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.1% | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.7M | $39.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.1M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
