vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Latham Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($100.0M vs $75.5M, roughly 1.3× PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.). On growth, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.7% vs 14.5%). PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $14.1M). Over the past eight quarters, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (31.3% CAGR vs -4.9%).
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
PBYI vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.5M | $100.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $-7.0M |
| Gross Margin | 69.3% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 22.7% | -10.7% |
| Net Margin | — | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 27.7% | 14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 76.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.26 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $75.5M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.5M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.4M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.0M | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.1M | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.5M | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.1M | $160.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.8M | $110.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.8M | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | 69.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.7% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.5% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.1% | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 76.4% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.9% | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.4% | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 75.5% | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | 22.7% | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.6% | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.6% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.6% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | -7.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.26 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.17 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.40 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.41 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $97.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.7M | $279.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $130.3M | $405.9M |
| Total Assets | $216.3M | $823.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $97.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.0M | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.3M | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.7M | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.3M | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.7M | $282.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $102.0M | $282.8M |
| Q4 25 | $130.3M | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.3M | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.7M | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.1M | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.1M | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.5M | $408.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.0M | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $216.3M | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $202.9M | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.9M | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $196.2M | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.3M | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $220.7M | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.0M | $830.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $214.1M | $808.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.30× | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.43× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.00× | 0.72× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.4M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.4M | $14.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.1% | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.7M | $38.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2M | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6M | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-39.9M |
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.8% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.4% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -36.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.10× | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PBYI
Segment breakdown not available.
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
