vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Urban Edge Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.6M vs $75.5M, roughly 1.8× PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.). On growth, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.7% vs 12.2%). Over the past eight quarters, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (31.3% CAGR vs 11.6%).
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
PBYI vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.5M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | — | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 69.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 22.7% | — |
| Net Margin | — | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 27.7% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.26 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.5M | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.5M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.4M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.0M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.1M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.5M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.1M | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.5M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 69.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 76.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.6% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.6% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.6% | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.26 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.17 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.40 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.41 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $97.5M | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $130.3M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $216.3M | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $97.5M | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.4M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.0M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.2M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.0M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.7M | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.8M | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $130.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.5M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $216.3M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $202.9M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.9M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $196.2M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.3M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $220.7M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.0M | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.4M | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6M | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6M | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.8% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.4% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.10× | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.21× | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PBYI
Segment breakdown not available.
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |
