vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of POTLATCHDELTIC CORP (PCH) and STONERIDGE INC (SRI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
POTLATCHDELTIC CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($314.2M vs $205.2M, roughly 1.5× STONERIDGE INC). On growth, POTLATCHDELTIC CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.1% vs -6.0%). POTLATCHDELTIC CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($50.1M vs $2.6M). Over the past eight quarters, POTLATCHDELTIC CORP's revenue compounded faster (11.1% CAGR vs -7.4%).
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPPCHEarnings & Financial Report
PotlatchDeltic Corporation is an American diversified forest products company based in Spokane, Washington.
Stoneridge Inc is a global designer and manufacturer of advanced electrical and electronic components, integrated systems, and sensor solutions. It serves automotive, commercial vehicle, off-highway, and aerospace sectors, delivering products that boost vehicle safety, efficiency, connectivity, and environmental performance across key global markets.
PCH vs SRI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $314.2M | $205.2M |
| Net Profit | $25.9M | — |
| Gross Margin | 18.2% | 16.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | -14.4% |
| Net Margin | 8.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 23.1% | -6.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 682.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $-2.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $205.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $314.2M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $275.0M | $228.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.3M | $217.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.1M | $218.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.1M | $213.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.7M | $237.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $228.1M | $239.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-305.0K | $-6.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | 20.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.2% | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | -1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.1% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | -3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.1% | -2.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $-0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $88.8M | $66.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $180.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $179.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $551.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.8M | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.3M | $49.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.5M | $79.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.6M | $71.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.1M | $54.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.7M | $42.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $180.2M | $48.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $201.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $179.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $251.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $260.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $253.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $271.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $270.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $277.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $632.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $639.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $657.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $621.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $662.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $666.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $675.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.51× | 0.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $65.7M | $8.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.1M | $2.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | 1.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.9% | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.54× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $132.4M | $12.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.7M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.4M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.5M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.6M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.0M | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.1M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.6M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.4M | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.2M | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.4M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.58× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.99× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.35× | 3.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCH
| Lumber | $131.8M | 42% |
| Timberlands | $52.5M | 17% |
| Rural Real Estate | $51.3M | 16% |
| Residuals And Panels | $34.0M | 11% |
| Pulpwood | $16.7M | 5% |
| Development Real Estate | $14.6M | 5% |
| Other | $8.1M | 3% |
| Other Products | $5.2M | 2% |
SRI
| Control Devices | $51.7M | 25% |
| Electronics | $38.0M | 19% |
| EE | $34.2M | 17% |
| SE | $28.6M | 14% |
| NL | $24.5M | 12% |
| Stoneridge Brazil | $14.1M | 7% |
| Asia Pacific | $13.1M | 6% |
