vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of POTLATCHDELTIC CORP (PCH) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
POTLATCHDELTIC CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($314.2M vs $220.8M, roughly 1.4× UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC). POTLATCHDELTIC CORP runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs 5.8%, a 2.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, POTLATCHDELTIC CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.1% vs 9.6%). POTLATCHDELTIC CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($50.1M vs $-19.2M). Over the past eight quarters, POTLATCHDELTIC CORP's revenue compounded faster (11.1% CAGR vs 9.5%).
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPPCHEarnings & Financial Report
PotlatchDeltic Corporation is an American diversified forest products company based in Spokane, Washington.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
PCH vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $314.2M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $25.9M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 18.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 8.2% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.1% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 682.5% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $314.2M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $275.0M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.3M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.1M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.1M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.7M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $228.1M | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-305.0K | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.1% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.1% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $88.8M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.8M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.3M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.5M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.6M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.1M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.7M | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $180.2M | $116.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $137.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $141.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $239.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $232.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $706.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $702.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.51× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $65.7M | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.1M | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.9% | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.54× | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $132.4M | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.7M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.4M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.5M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.6M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.0M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.1M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.6M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.4M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.2M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.2% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | -4.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.58× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.74× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.99× | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.35× | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCH
| Lumber | $131.8M | 42% |
| Timberlands | $52.5M | 17% |
| Rural Real Estate | $51.3M | 16% |
| Residuals And Panels | $34.0M | 11% |
| Pulpwood | $16.7M | 5% |
| Development Real Estate | $14.6M | 5% |
| Other | $8.1M | 3% |
| Other Products | $5.2M | 2% |
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
