vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of POTLATCHDELTIC CORP (PCH) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Verisign is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.3M vs $314.2M, roughly 1.4× POTLATCHDELTIC CORP). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 8.2%, a 40.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, POTLATCHDELTIC CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.1% vs 7.6%). Verisign produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.1M vs $50.1M). Over the past eight quarters, POTLATCHDELTIC CORP's revenue compounded faster (11.1% CAGR vs 5.2%).
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPPCHEarnings & Financial Report
PotlatchDeltic Corporation is an American diversified forest products company based in Spokane, Washington.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
PCH vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $314.2M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $25.9M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | 18.2% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 8.2% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.1% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 682.5% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $314.2M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $275.0M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.3M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.1M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.1M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.7M | $387.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $228.1M | $384.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-305.0K | $194.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.2% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.1% | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.1% | 50.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $88.8M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.8M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.3M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.5M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.6M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.1M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.7M | $689.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $180.2M | $924.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $-1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $65.7M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.1M | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.9% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.54× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $132.4M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.7M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.4M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.5M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.6M | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.0M | $257.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.1M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.6M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.4M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.2M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.4M | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $253.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.2% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 66.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.58× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.74× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.99× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.35× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCH
| Lumber | $131.8M | 42% |
| Timberlands | $52.5M | 17% |
| Rural Real Estate | $51.3M | 16% |
| Residuals And Panels | $34.0M | 11% |
| Pulpwood | $16.7M | 5% |
| Development Real Estate | $14.6M | 5% |
| Other | $8.1M | 3% |
| Other Products | $5.2M | 2% |
VRSN
Segment breakdown not available.
