vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.1M vs $224.2M, roughly 1.6× STAG Industrial, Inc.). STAG Industrial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.6% vs -10.8%, a 38.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs 9.1%). Over the past eight quarters, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 8.7%).
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
PCOR vs STAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $349.1M | $224.2M |
| Net Profit | $-37.6M | $62.0M |
| Gross Margin | 80.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -12.3% | — |
| Net Margin | -10.8% | 27.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.6% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 39.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.25 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $224.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $349.1M | $220.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $338.9M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.9M | $207.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.6M | $205.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $302.0M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | $190.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $284.3M | $189.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-37.6M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.1M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.1M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.0M | $91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-62.3M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.4M | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.3M | $59.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 80.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 79.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 79.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 79.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 83.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -12.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.7% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.6% | 44.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.6% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.2% | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.22 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.42 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $768.5M | $8.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $768.5M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $684.0M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $620.9M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.7M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $775.4M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $756.9M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $735.4M | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $114.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 31.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $282.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $114.9M | $104.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.5M | $143.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.8M | $111.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.0M | $103.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.1M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.3M | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.7M | $122.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $109.2M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.1M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.9M | $62.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.0M | $57.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4M | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.7M | $86.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.8M | $105.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.5% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 27.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.1% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.0% | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |
STAG
Segment breakdown not available.
