vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR) and Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Savers Value Village, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($426.9M vs $349.1M, roughly 1.2× PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). Savers Value Village, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3.3% vs -10.8%, a 7.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs 8.1%). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($109.2M vs $-6.3M). Over the past eight quarters, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 4.3%).
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
Value Village Stores, Inc. was a Midwestern United States chain of retail stores aimed at the discount department-store market. Henry Horney, formerly of F.W. Woolworth Company founded a small, regional chain of discount stores located in the two states of Wisconsin and Illinois that opened in 1961 and operated into 1989. Horney also had a real estate company and often built small shopping malls adjoining the discount stores. The chain had no relation to the Savers Value Village chain of thri...
PCOR vs SVV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $349.1M | $426.9M |
| Net Profit | $-37.6M | $-14.0M |
| Gross Margin | 80.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -12.3% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | -10.8% | -3.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.6% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 39.6% | -164.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.25 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $349.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $338.9M | $426.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.9M | $417.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.6M | $370.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $302.0M | $402.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | $394.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $284.3M | $386.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $269.4M | $354.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-37.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.1M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.1M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.0M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-62.3M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.4M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.3M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $-467.0K |
| Q4 25 | 80.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 79.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 79.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 79.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.4% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 83.1% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 83.0% | 24.2% |
| Q4 25 | -12.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.4% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.3% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.7% | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.6% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.6% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.1% | -0.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.22 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.42 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.18 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $768.5M | $63.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $750.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $414.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $768.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $684.0M | $63.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $620.9M | $70.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.7M | $73.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $775.4M | $150.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $756.9M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $735.4M | $160.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $744.6M | $102.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $750.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $414.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $423.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $413.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $421.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $432.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $419.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $395.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $114.9M | $21.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.2M | $-6.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 31.3% | -1.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 6.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $282.2M | $25.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $114.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.5M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.8M | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.0M | $419.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.1M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.3M | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.7M | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.1M | $-5.8M |
| Q4 25 | $109.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.1M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.9M | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.0M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.7M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.8M | $29.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.1M | $-28.3M |
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.5% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.1% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.9% | -8.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |
SVV
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $408.3M | 96% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $18.6M | 4% |
