vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR) and Vroom, Inc. (VRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.1M vs $235.9M, roughly 1.5× Vroom, Inc.). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — -10.8% vs -59.8%, a 49.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs 12.9%). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($109.2M vs $-108.8M). Over the past eight quarters, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs -49.5%).
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
Vroom, Inc. is a parent company of United Auto Credit Corporation (UACC) and CarStory. Previously, Vroom was a used car retailer and e-commerce company that let consumers buy, sell, and finance cars online. Vroom ceased e-commerce automotive sales operations on January 22, 2024.
PCOR vs VRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $349.1M | $235.9M |
| Net Profit | $-37.6M | $-141.1M |
| Gross Margin | 80.1% | 12.3% |
| Operating Margin | -12.3% | -11.5% |
| Net Margin | -10.8% | -59.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.6% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 39.6% | -669.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.25 | $-80.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $349.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $338.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $302.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $284.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $269.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-37.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-62.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 80.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 79.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 79.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 79.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 83.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 83.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -12.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.22 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.42 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $768.5M | $135.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $454.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $127.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.56× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $768.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $684.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $620.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $775.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $756.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $735.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $744.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $114.9M | $-108.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.2M | $-108.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 31.3% | -46.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $282.2M | $-536.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $114.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $109.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $67.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |
VRM
Segment breakdown not available.
