vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Processa Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (PCSA) and Alaunos Therapeutics, Inc. (TCRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Processa Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company dedicated to developing innovative therapeutic solutions for patients with high unmet medical needs. Its core product pipeline targets rare diseases, gastrointestinal disorders, and dermatological conditions, with primary operational focus on the North American and European healthcare markets.
Alaunos Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company that develops novel T cell receptor (TCR) immunotherapies for the treatment of hard-to-treat solid tumors. The firm focuses on advancing precision oncology candidates targeting shared tumor antigens, serving global oncology patient populations via internal R&D and cross-sector partnerships.
PCSA vs TCRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2023 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0 | $3.0K |
| Net Profit | $-2.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | -40.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 65.4% | -20.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.54 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -54600.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -29150.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -174200.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -53650.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -28225.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -168200.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.9M | $1.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.2M | $2.2M |
| Total Assets | $8.1M | $3.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $319.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.8M | $-2.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -98900.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3266.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-844.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-701.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-772.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-781.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -98900.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 3266.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
