vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PURE CYCLE CORP (PCYO) and High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PURE CYCLE CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.1M vs $6.3M, roughly 1.5× High Roller Technologies, Inc.). High Roller Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 58.4% vs 50.0%, a 8.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PURE CYCLE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.8% vs -16.4%).
Pure Cycles, is a bicycle company based in Los Angeles, California that was founded by Michael Fishman, Jordan Schau, Zachary Schau and Austin Stoffers in 2010, as Pure Fix Cycles.
S&S – Sansei Technologies is an American company known for its pneumatically powered amusement rides and roller coaster designing.
PCYO vs ROLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.1M | $6.3M |
| Net Profit | $4.6M | $3.7M |
| Gross Margin | 68.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 48.0% | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | 50.0% | 58.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.8% | -16.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 16.0% | 831.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.6M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $-592.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $809.0K | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6M | $-501.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 68.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | -7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.2% | -47.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.0% | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 50.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 54.5% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.9% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | -48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.6% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.27 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $17.1M | $2.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $147.5M | $6.6M |
| Total Assets | $168.1M | $16.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.05× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.9M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $147.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $136.7M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $134.4M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.7M | $-779.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $120.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $168.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.7M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $149.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.4M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $135.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-979.0K | $-78.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-90.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.21× | -0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-979.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4M | $-78.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-503.0K | $-840.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $892.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-457.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-90.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-845.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -53.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.53× | -0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.70× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.87× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCYO
| Construction | $6.5M | 71% |
| Water And Wastewater Resource Development Segment | $2.5M | 27% |
ROLR
| Net Gaming Revenue | $4.9M | 77% |
| Net Revenue Noncore Services | $1.4M | 23% |
