vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of PURE CYCLE CORP (PCYO) and VALUE LINE INC (VALU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PURE CYCLE CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.1M vs $8.3M, roughly 1.1× VALUE LINE INC). VALUE LINE INC runs the higher net margin — 71.4% vs 50.0%, a 21.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PURE CYCLE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.8% vs -7.7%). Over the past eight quarters, PURE CYCLE CORP's revenue compounded faster (69.0% CAGR vs -4.1%).

Pure Cycles, is a bicycle company based in Los Angeles, California that was founded by Michael Fishman, Jordan Schau, Zachary Schau and Austin Stoffers in 2010, as Pure Fix Cycles.

Value Line, Inc. is a publicly traded investment research and financial publishing firm based in New York City. Founded in 1931 by Arnold Bernhard, Value Line is best known for publishing The Value Line Investment Survey, a stock analysis newsletter that tracks approximately 1,700 publicly traded stocks.

PCYO vs VALU — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PCYO
PCYO
1.1× larger
PCYO
$9.1M
$8.3M
VALU
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PCYO
PCYO
+66.5% gap
PCYO
58.8%
-7.7%
VALU
Higher net margin
VALU
VALU
21.4% more per $
VALU
71.4%
50.0%
PCYO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PCYO
PCYO
Annualised
PCYO
69.0%
-4.1%
VALU

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Revenue
$9.1M
$8.3M
Net Profit
$4.6M
$5.9M
Gross Margin
68.4%
Operating Margin
48.0%
12.1%
Net Margin
50.0%
71.4%
Revenue YoY
58.8%
-7.7%
Net Profit YoY
16.0%
14.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.19

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
$8.3M
Q4 25
$9.1M
$8.6M
Q3 25
$11.2M
$8.6M
Q2 25
$5.1M
$8.4M
Q1 25
$4.0M
$9.0M
Q4 24
$5.8M
$8.8M
Q3 24
$12.6M
$8.9M
Q2 24
$7.6M
$9.0M
Net Profit
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
$5.9M
Q4 25
$4.6M
$5.7M
Q3 25
$6.1M
$6.5M
Q2 25
$2.3M
$4.0M
Q1 25
$809.0K
$5.2M
Q4 24
$3.9M
$5.7M
Q3 24
$6.6M
$5.9M
Q2 24
$2.8M
$4.8M
Gross Margin
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
Q4 25
68.4%
Q3 25
67.7%
Q2 25
63.4%
Q1 25
38.2%
Q4 24
63.8%
Q3 24
77.8%
Q2 24
64.0%
Operating Margin
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
12.1%
Q4 25
48.0%
17.7%
Q3 25
53.1%
17.4%
Q2 25
26.0%
9.9%
Q1 25
-33.2%
17.4%
Q4 24
29.9%
19.7%
Q3 24
62.0%
20.8%
Q2 24
40.3%
16.5%
Net Margin
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
71.4%
Q4 25
50.0%
66.4%
Q3 25
54.5%
75.1%
Q2 25
43.9%
47.1%
Q1 25
20.3%
57.6%
Q4 24
68.4%
64.3%
Q3 24
52.6%
66.3%
Q2 24
37.2%
53.1%
EPS (diluted)
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0.19
Q3 25
$0.26
Q2 25
$0.09
Q1 25
$0.03
Q4 24
$0.16
Q3 24
$0.27
Q2 24
$0.12

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$17.1M
$92.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$8.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$147.5M
$107.8M
Total Assets
$168.1M
$151.0M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.05×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
$92.5M
Q4 25
$17.1M
$86.6M
Q3 25
$21.9M
$33.7M
Q2 25
$14.4M
$67.7M
Q1 25
$16.5M
$52.8M
Q4 24
$19.0M
$22.3M
Q3 24
$22.1M
$30.9M
Q2 24
$20.5M
$4.4M
Total Debt
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
Q4 25
$8.0M
Q3 25
$6.8M
Q2 25
$6.9M
Q1 25
$6.9M
Q4 24
$6.9M
Q3 24
$6.9M
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
$107.8M
Q4 25
$147.5M
$105.5M
Q3 25
$142.7M
$103.0M
Q2 25
$136.7M
$99.7M
Q1 25
$134.4M
$99.0M
Q4 24
$133.6M
$96.7M
Q3 24
$129.7M
$93.9M
Q2 24
$123.2M
$90.8M
Total Assets
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
$151.0M
Q4 25
$168.1M
$147.9M
Q3 25
$162.3M
$148.2M
Q2 25
$151.7M
$144.5M
Q1 25
$149.7M
$143.6M
Q4 24
$149.7M
$140.0M
Q3 24
$147.4M
$138.6M
Q2 24
$140.4M
$136.0M
Debt / Equity
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.05×
Q3 25
0.05×
Q2 25
0.05×
Q1 25
0.05×
Q4 24
0.05×
Q3 24
0.05×
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-979.0K
$5.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-0.21×
0.89×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
$5.3M
Q4 25
$-979.0K
$3.0M
Q3 25
$9.4M
$5.6M
Q2 25
$-503.0K
$20.2M
Q1 25
$-1.4M
$6.9M
Q4 24
$5.7M
$3.1M
Q3 24
$3.1M
$4.8M
Q2 24
$892.0K
$17.9M
Free Cash Flow
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
$20.1M
Q1 25
$6.8M
Q4 24
$3.0M
Q3 24
$4.8M
Q2 24
$17.9M
FCF Margin
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
239.2%
Q1 25
75.3%
Q4 24
34.1%
Q3 24
53.7%
Q2 24
199.0%
Capex Intensity
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
0.0%
Q4 25
0.0%
Q3 25
0.0%
Q2 25
2.1%
Q1 25
1.2%
Q4 24
0.7%
Q3 24
0.0%
Q2 24
0.2%
Cash Conversion
PCYO
PCYO
VALU
VALU
Q1 26
0.89×
Q4 25
-0.21×
0.52×
Q3 25
1.53×
0.86×
Q2 25
-0.22×
5.12×
Q1 25
-1.70×
1.33×
Q4 24
1.44×
0.54×
Q3 24
0.47×
0.81×
Q2 24
0.32×
3.75×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

PCYO
PCYO

Construction$6.5M71%
Water And Wastewater Resource Development Segment$2.5M27%

VALU
VALU

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons