vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PDD Holdings Inc. (PDD) and Supermicro (SMCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PDD Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.2B vs $12.7B, roughly 1.2× Supermicro). PDD Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.1% vs 3.2%, a 23.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Supermicro's revenue compounded faster (81.5% CAGR vs 74.6%).
Pinduoduo is a Chinese online retailer, with a focus on the traditional agriculture industry. The business is the largest product of PDD Holdings, a company currently headquartered in Ireland that also owns the online marketplace Temu.
Super Micro Computer, Inc., doing business as Supermicro, is an American information technology company based in San Jose, California. The company is one of the largest producers of high-performance and high-efficiency servers, while also providing server management software, and storage systems for various markets, including enterprise data centers, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, 5G, and edge computing.
PDD vs SMCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.2B | $12.7B |
| Net Profit | $4.1B | $400.6M |
| Gross Margin | 56.7% | 6.3% |
| Operating Margin | 23.1% | 3.7% |
| Net Margin | 27.1% | 3.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 123.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 24.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.60 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.5B | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.0B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | $400.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $168.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3B | $195.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $108.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $320.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $424.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $297.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | $402.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 62.3% | 15.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.9% | 9.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.3% | 10.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-12.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.0B | $4.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $55.0B | $7.0B |
| Total Assets | $86.2B | $28.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.0B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.5B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.7B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.3B | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $28.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.2B | $14.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.2B | $14.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.5B | $10.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.3B | $8.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.4B | $-23.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-45.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.56× | -0.06× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $440.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-23.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $-917.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $863.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $626.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-239.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $408.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-641.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $-1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $-45.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-949.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $840.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $594.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-267.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $364.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-655.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -41.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.56× | -5.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.70× | 4.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.10× | 0.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.75× | -3.78× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
