vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) and IMPINJ INC (PI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.9M vs $74.3M, roughly 1.9× IMPINJ INC). IMPINJ INC runs the higher net margin — 11.2% vs -30.3%, a 41.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMPINJ INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.0% vs -0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.6% CAGR vs -14.9%).
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
Impinj, Inc. is an American manufacturer of radio-frequency identification (RFID) devices and software. The company was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in Seattle, Washington. The company was started based on the research done at the California Institute of Technology by Carver Mead and Chris Diorio. Impinj currently produces EPC Class 1, Gen 2 passive UHF RFID chips, RFID readers, RFID reader chips, and RFID antennas, and software applications for encoding chips, and gathering business ...
PDM vs PI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $142.9M | $74.3M |
| Net Profit | $-43.2M | $8.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 30.5% |
| Net Margin | -30.3% | 11.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.3% | -0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.34 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $74.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $142.9M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2M | $96.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.3M | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $74.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.2M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.3M | $95.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $102.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-43.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.1M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $221.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.8M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 51.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 56.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | -13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.1% | -11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.9% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.8% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $0.39 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $731.0K | $131.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.2B | $241.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | — |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $502.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.49× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $131.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $731.0K | $175.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $190.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $193.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $147.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.6M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.5M | $220.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $241.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $280.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $280.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $283.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $209.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $195.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $187.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $160.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $149.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $136.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $117.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $502.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $545.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $516.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $508.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $479.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $476.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $446.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | 1.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $140.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $61.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.6M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.1M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.1M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.9M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | $45.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $44.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PDM
| Atlanta GA | $45.7M | 32% |
| Dallas TX | $24.1M | 17% |
| Orlando FL | $19.3M | 13% |
| New York NY | $14.7M | 10% |
| Northern Virginia Washington D.C. | $12.9M | 9% |
| Minneapolis MN | $11.4M | 8% |
| Boston MA | $9.8M | 7% |
| Real Estate Other | $7.8M | 5% |
PI
Segment breakdown not available.
